A service member who believes a policy or a commander’s action is discriminatory is not without recourse, and a legal assistance attorney is often the first stop for figuring out which recourse fits. The military has formal channels for challenging wrongs, each with its own rules, and choosing the right one, on time, matters as much as the merits of the complaint.
The Article 138 complaint
One of the most direct tools is a complaint under Article 138 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. It allows any member of the armed forces who believes they have been wronged by their commanding officer to seek redress, and it follows a strict sequence:
- Request redress first. Before filing a formal complaint, the member must make a written request for redress to the commanding officer who allegedly committed the wrong. That commander generally has 15 days to respond in writing.
- File the formal complaint. If redress is denied, the member delivers a written complaint to the immediate superior commissioned officer, generally within 90 days of discovering the wrong. The time the request sat with the commanding officer is excluded from that 90-day count.
- A higher authority reviews it. The officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction over the officer complained against is responsible for addressing the complaint.
Two protections are worth knowing. A service member has the right to consult a legal assistance attorney for help drafting both the request for redress and the formal complaint, and may also hire civilian counsel at their own expense. And the process is shielded from retaliation: no one, regardless of rank, may order or pressure a member to withdraw the complaint, and if that happens the member should consult an attorney or the Inspector General immediately.
Other channels
Article 138 is not the only avenue, and part of the attorney’s value is matching the problem to the right forum:
- Equal Opportunity / Military Equal Opportunity (EO/MEO) programs handle complaints of unlawful discrimination and harassment through a dedicated process.
- The Inspector General (IG) receives complaints about waste, abuse, and certain wrongs, and is also the place to report reprisal.
Each channel has different timelines, different decision-makers, and different remedies, which is exactly why a member should not simply pick the most familiar one.
What the attorney does
Imagine a member who believes a command policy is discriminatory: after requesting redress and being refused, they may file an Article 138 complaint that rises to a general court-martial convening authority, protected against retaliation for filing.
The realistic role is advisory and procedural rather than courtroom advocacy. A legal assistance attorney helps the member understand which channel applies, drafts the written redress request and complaint so the issue is framed correctly, tracks the deadlines that can otherwise forfeit the claim, and explains the anti-retaliation protections. Because the Article 138 clock and the redress-first requirement are easy to miss, getting advice early, before the 90-day window narrows, is the practical key.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a deadline to start an Equal Opportunity complaint?
The EO and Military Equal Opportunity processes have their own timelines, which can differ from the Article 138 deadlines. Because they vary, confirming the applicable window early is important.
Can I use more than one complaint channel at the same time?
Sometimes, but the channels have different scopes and rules, and pursuing several at once can complicate a case. Counsel can help decide which forum fits the specific issue.
Will filing a complaint hurt my career?
The law specifically prohibits reprisal for protected complaints, and concerns about records or career effects are exactly the kind of question to raise with a legal assistance attorney before and during the process.
This article is general information about military complaint and redress channels. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Procedures, timelines, and forums vary by service and circumstance and can change. Service members should consult a legal assistance attorney or the appropriate office about their specific situation.
Sources
- <a href="https://home.army.mil/wood/application/files/6016/1713/8001/TheArticle138_Process.pdf”>U.S. Army (Fort Leonard Wood), The Article 138 Process
- Air Force JAG, Article 138, UCMJ, Complaint
- MyNavyHR, Equal Opportunity, Resolving an Issue