Yes, and in the military this request has a specific vehicle and a relatively low threshold to obtain. The mechanism is a sanity board under Rule for Courts-Martial 706, and it can examine two distinct things about an accused. Understanding which question is at issue, and how readily a board can be ordered, is the key to using this tool.
Two different questions
A mental-health inquiry under R.C.M. 706 can address two separate issues, and they are not the same:
- Mental capacity (competency to stand trial). This is about the accused’s present ability to participate in the proceedings. A person may not be tried unless they are mentally competent to stand trial.
- Mental responsibility. This looks back to the time of the offense, asking whether a severe mental disease or defect affected the accused’s responsibility, the basis for an insanity-type defense.
The 1984 Manual distinguished these as independent grounds for an examination, and keeping them separate matters, because a member can be perfectly competent now yet have a mental-responsibility issue at the time of the alleged conduct, or vice versa.
Who can request it, and the standard
The request is not the defense’s alone, but the defense can certainly make it. A sanity board may be initiated by the commander, an investigating officer, trial counsel, defense counsel, the military judge, or a panel member who questions the accused’s capacity or responsibility.
The threshold is favorable: a sanity board should be granted if the request is not frivolous and is made in good faith. That is a meaningful point, the defense does not have to prove mental incapacity to get the evaluation; it must raise a non-frivolous, good-faith basis.
What the board is and produces
The board itself is a clinical body, not a legal one:
- Its members must be a physician or a clinical psychologist.
- It makes specific findings on mental responsibility and competence, including a clinical diagnosis.
- It issues a report with safeguards for the confidentiality of the accused’s statements.
Take a member whose competency to stand trial is genuinely in doubt: the defense can request a sanity board, which should be ordered on a non-frivolous, good-faith showing rather than on proof of incapacity.
The essential takeaway is that the military provides a clear path to a mental-health evaluation through the R.C.M. 706 sanity board. It separates present competency from mental responsibility at the time of the offense, the defense can request it, and the board should be granted on a non-frivolous, good-faith showing, which makes it an accessible and important tool.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a sanity board?
A clinical board under R.C.M. 706 that inquires into an accused’s mental capacity to stand trial or mental responsibility at the time of the offense, composed of a physician or clinical psychologist and issuing findings with a diagnosis.
Can the defense request a mental-health evaluation?
Yes. A sanity board may be requested by the defense, among others, and should be granted if the request is not frivolous and is made in good faith.
What is the difference between competency and mental responsibility?
Competency is the accused’s present ability to stand trial, while mental responsibility looks back to the accused’s mental state at the time of the alleged offense.
This article is general information about military mental-health evaluations. It is not legal advice or medical advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Application is fact-specific and the law can change. Anyone facing a court-martial should consult qualified defense counsel.
Sources